X6-88: evil: this thing has no regard for human life, has no morals and would genocide the common wealth if ordered too.

Strong: this guy is so mixed up idk what he is.

Preston: lawful good: this man is literally trying to rebuild the commonwealth.

v3.0 - adds Crime and Punishment karma links, some Hardship integration options. He believes in helping those in need and goes the extra mile to do it Once Fallout 4 is installed, make sure you run it once. Macready isn’t a bad person but his background kind of forced him into this life.

Hancock: lawful evil: Hancock is all about doing the wrong thing to send the right message.

Reason Good man but plays dirty to get his way Reason Danse wants to do right by people but the brotherhood has so much of a hand up his rear it prevents him from putting morals first. What can I say her purpose was to help people. Reputation system seems to fit a morally grey wasteland a lot better, and makes Karma redundant. Reason pipers heart is in the right place but she can’t stop causing trouble Reason he’s pre war kind set and still believed in the good of humanity and the sole survivor. Who would you place under “good,” “neutral,” and “evil?” Some of these I suspect can be debatable (I normally run solo, but I want to start collecting more companion perks), so I’d like to see why you group some of them the way you do. We’re back with another Pros vs Cons This timethe removal of karma in Fallout 4Subscribe for more gaming discussions :)TWITCH. Fallout 4 was one of the biggest-selling games of 2015, and the first big franchise release for Bethesda’s internal game development studio since Skyrim in 2011.

I’m curious about the community’s input: how would you classify the companions in this game based off their karma (like they were in Fallout 3).

Fallout 4 no karma